QNET ANSWERS

Disparaging information about QNET must be accurate because it’s in the Wikipedia entry.

At QNET, we strongly dispute the credibility of the Wikipedia entry on our company. But on the contrary, we can’t do much about it, as Wikipedia’s policy doesn’t allow a company representative, a PR agency, or anyone with a stake in the matter to edit entries. In the past, we have sent a complaint to Wikipedia about the heavy bias of the entry and a debate has then been opened on their “”Neutral Point of View”” notice board. However, despite our efforts to address the issue, the Wikipedia community ultimately has the final say on the content of the entry. We continue to focus on providing accurate information about our company through our official channels and platforms.

Please note that Wikipedia is not considered a reliably authentic source of information, which the site itself acknowledges. Wikipedia is a public forum where anyone can edit an entry. Resulting in many of the entries being well-documented, while some can be manipulated to spread undetectable sources of information.

Why is QNET so often referred to as QNET scam, a pyramid scheme, and/or a fraudulent business aimed at cheating people?

To answer this question, it is important to first understand the difference between a legitimate direct selling company and a…

Who is responsible for resolving customer issues when there are problems, QNET or your IDs?

If any customer has a product or service-related grievance, QNET will take full responsibility for it. We have a multilingual…

How do I contact QNET?

You can reach out to our Award-winning Global Support Centre (GSC) which operates in 12 languages from 14 global hubs.

In which countries does QNET operate?

QNET maintains a network of offices and agencies across over 25 countries globally. These locations play a vital role in…